Home
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Cambridge vs. Unit Heaters
Two Identical Side-By-Side Buildings Each with 200,000 sq. ft. x 25' high;
R-15 Roof/R-15 Walls
Building #1 |
Building #2 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
Unit Heater System |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Cost |
![]() |
$ .75/therm |
$22,000 |
$1.00/therm |
$30,000 |
$1.25/therm |
$38,000 |
Results:
The Cambridge Heating System used38% less gas and provided ventilation.
If Building #2 had installed a high efficiency Cambridge System they could have saved



