Home
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Cambridge vs. Air Turnover
Warehouse #1 |
 |
Warehouse #2 |
||
 |
 |
|||
215,000 ft2 x 30' high, R-19 Roof/R-11 Walls |
228,000 ft2 x 27' high, R-19 Roof/R-10 Walls |
|||
Cambridge Heating System |
Air Turnover System (Air Rotation) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Cost |
Electric Cost |
 |
$ .75/therm |
$ .08/kwh |
$46,000 |
$1.00/therm |
$ .10/kwh |
$62,000 |
$1.25/therm |
$.12/kwh |
$75,000 |
Results:
The Cambridge Heating System used 68%less total energy per sq. ft. of floor space
and provided ventilation.
If Warehouse #2 had installed
a high efficieny Cambridge System they could have saved